WRONGFUL REPOSSESSION

Toyota Financial Issued a Repo Order on a Debt They Charged Off in 2018

Georgia 6-Year Statute of Limitations Expired Years Before This Vehicle Was Taken

2012 Acura TL w/Tech Package | VIN: 19UUA8F53CA023983 | Repossessed: July 2, 2026

What Happened --
Read This First

On July 2, 2026, during the Fourth of July holiday weekend, my 2012 Acura TL was taken from the public street in front of my home by Tristate Recovery, acting on a repo order from Toyota Financial Services. I was not home. I was attending the burial of my cousin - close family I grew up with, whose children spent nights in my home.

I returned from the burial to find my vehicle gone with zero warning. As of July 13, 2026, I have received zero notice - no letter, no call, nothing.

The debt Toyota acted on was charged off March 3, 2018. Georgia law gives creditors six years - that window closed in 2022-2023. Toyota Financial deliberately reopened the account in 2025 and issued a repo order in September 2025. Reopening an account does not restart the statute of limitations. This repossession was unlawful.

⚖️ Federal Complaint Filed

CFPB Complaint On Federal Record

A formal complaint has been filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) against Toyota Motor Credit Corporation regarding this wrongful repossession. Toyota is required by federal law to respond in writing within 15 days.

Complaint Details

📋 Complaint ID: 260708-35228474

🏢 Filed Against: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

📅 Date Filed: July 8, 2026

⏱️ Response Deadline: July 23, 2026

🌐 Verify: consumerfinance.gov

Legal Framework

Multiple Laws. One Victim. Zero Excuses.

This vehicle was repossessed in Georgia — but the loan originated in California and the title was never transferred to Georgia. That means Toyota Financial violated laws in two states and under federal law — simultaneously.

🔑 Key Weapon — Emergency Injunction Argument

Vehicle Is Still California-Titled — Never Re-Titled in Georgia

California DMV still holds the active title record on this vehicle. Toyota Financial may not have the legal authority to auction a California-titled vehicle at a Georgia auction without first processing a title transfer through California’s DMV. A buyer at that auction could face serious title defects. This is a direct basis to challenge the July 27, 2026 sale and the strongest immediate argument for an emergency court injunction to stop it.

⚖️
Georgia Law

UCC Article 9

Governs the repo itself because it occurred in DeKalb County, Georgia. Requires proper post-repossession notice and a commercially reasonable, properly noticed sale process.

✗ VIOLATED: Zero written notice received. Sale notice requirements not met. No commercially reasonable sale notice delivered.

📄
California Law

Rees-Levering Automobile Sales Finance Act

Applies because the loan originated in Folsom, CA in 2015. Requires Toyota to send a specific written Notice of Intention to Dispose of Motor Vehicle before any sale. Failure to do so eliminates their right to collect any deficiency balance.

✗ VIOLATED: No notice sent. Toyota loses ALL right to pursue any deficiency judgment under California law.

🇺🇸
Federal Law — No State Lines

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

Applies everywhere — regardless of what state the car is titled in, registered in, or where the loan originated. Governs Tristate Recovery’s conduct. Debt collectors cannot collect on a debt past the statute of limitations.

✗ VIOLATED: Debt charged off March 2018. SOL expired ~2022–2023. Repo executed July 2, 2026 — years after expiration. Zero notice.

🏛️
California Law — Bonus Layer

Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Unlike the federal FDCPA which only covers third-party collectors, California’s Rosenthal Act applies directly to original creditors. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation is California-based — making Toyota Financial itself directly liable, not just Tristate.

✗ VIOLATED: Toyota Financial — as original creditor — is independently liable under California law on top of Tristate’s federal FDCPA exposure.

The Legal Stack — All Four Violated in a Single Repossession Event

Georgia
UCC Article 9
✗ VIOLATED
California
Rees-Levering Act
✗ VIOLATED
Federal
FDCPA
✗ VIOLATED
California
Rosenthal Act
✗ VIOLATED

Every applicable law — state and federal — was violated in a single repossession event on July 2, 2026. The vehicle remains California-titled, the debt is past the statute of limitations, and zero written notice was received under any jurisdiction. The scheduled sale date of July 27, 2026 cannot lawfully proceed.

⚠ URGENT UPDATE July 9, 2026

Toyota Scheduled This Vehicle For Sale On July 27, 2026

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation has scheduled the sale of this wrongfully repossessed vehicle without sending a single piece of written notice to the owner — in direct violation of Georgia law. The owner only discovered this sale date by personally calling Toyota. As of July 9, 2026 — seven days post-repossession — zero written notice of any kind has been received.

Scheduled Sale Date
July 27, 2026
8 Days After Repossession
Full Payoff Demanded
$21,042.44
On A Charged-Off Debt
Written Notice Received
ZERO
As Of Day 7 Post-Repo
New Recorded Call
July 9, 2026
Repo Dept — Agent ID Logged

⚠ Under Georgia law (O.C.G.A. §11-9-614), a creditor is required to provide written notice of the intended disposition of repossessed collateral before any sale. No such notice was provided. The sale of this vehicle before legal remedies are exhausted would constitute an additional violation and further irreparable harm.

Key Legal Metrics

CHARGE-OFF DATE

March 3, 2018

SOL EXPIRED

2022-2023

ACCOUNT REOPENED

2025

REPO ORDER

Sept 2025

REPO DATE

July 2, 2026

PRE-REPO NOTICE

NONE

POST-REPO NOTICE

NONE

DAILY FEES

$50-$100

STATUTORY BREACHES

Violations Identified

The unlawful taking of this vehicle on July 2, 2026, constitutes severe, documented breaches of both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A.). Tristate Recovery, acting as a third-party debt collector, and Toyota Financial Services executed this repossession without legal standing, acting upon an expired debt and failing all mandatory notification requirements. The following statutes and civil protections have been directly violated.

  • 1. Repo after GA statute of limitations expired (O.C.G.A. 11-9-625)

  • 2. FDCPA violations - Tristate Recovery is a third-party debt collector

  • 3. Account reopened 2025 after SOL - does not revive the debt

  • 4. Repo order issued September 2025 - years past SOL

  • 5. Zero pre-repossession notice

  • 6. Zero post-repossession notice as of July 9, 2026

  • 7. Repo executed on holiday weekend during owner's attendance at family burial

FORENSIC TIMELINE

Case Chronology

2015
Loan originated, Folsom Lake Toyota, Folsom CA
2016-2017
Default occurred
MAR 3, 2018
Charged off by Toyota Financial
2022-2023
Georgia 6-year SOL expires
2025
Toyota Financial reopens account - SOL does not restart
SEP 2025
Repo order issued to Tristate Recovery
JUL 2, 2026
Vehicle repossessed while owner attended family burial
JUL 6, 2026
NMVTIS report confirms no GA title, no salvage, no lien
JUL 9, 2026
Still zero notice received

Forensic Vault

Audio Evidence

KEY AUDIO EVIDENCE EXHIBIT A — 13:22

Toyota Agent Confirms: Account Charged Off & Reopened

On record: A Toyota Financial Services agent — speaking from their own automated-greeting confirmed line — explicitly confirmed this account was charged off in 2018 and subsequently reopened in 2025, years after the Georgia statute of limitations expired. The agent promised written email follow-up within 24–48 hours. That email was never received.

Agent Confirmed
Account Charged Off — 2018
Agent Confirmed
Account Reopened — 2025
Agent Promised
Email in 24–48 hrs — Never Sent
Call Verified By
Toyota's Own Automated Greeting

⚠ This recording begins with Toyota Financial's own automated phone system greeting — establishing it as an authenticated call to Toyota's official line. No debt acknowledgment was made by the account holder during this call.

Authentication Status

Both recordings are fully authenticated and preserved in their original, unaltered form and can be downloaded. They establish verifiable proof of conduct contradicting formal notices.

EXHIBIT B: SECURITY RECORDINGS

Repossession Footage

Two camera angles. Vehicle taken from public dead-end street. No breach of peace. No notice. No consent.

CAMERA ANGLE 1 - JULY 2, 2026

CAMERA ANGLE 2 - JULY 2, 2026

EVIDENCE VAULT

Supporting Documents

NMVTIS Vehicle History Report

Pulled July 6, 2026. No GA title, no salvage, no total loss, no lien. Last odometer 28,855 mi. Last title activity March 25, 2015, California.

Original Auto Loan Contract 2015

Folsom Lake Toyota. Establishes lender as Toyota Financial / Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.

Emotional Distress Documentation

Documentation of family burial service on July 3, 2026

EXHIBIT C: Day of Repossession

On July 2, 2026 - the same day this vehicle was unlawfully taken - the owner was dealing with the burial of his cousin, a woman he grew up alongside. Her children spent nights in his home. His family spent nights in hers.

He looked outside while still grieving from the burial to find his vehicle gone with zero notice. This document confirms the circumstances that gave rise to documented emotional distress damages.

GET IN TOUCH

Reach Me

If you are an attorney reviewing this case, please reach out directly. All communications are confidential.

CASE OWNER

Michael McPherson

CALL / TEXT

(470) 870-2107

This page is private and for attorney review and legal purposes only. All evidence is authenticated and available upon request.

Page developed by Smart Wave Marketing